CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:16 am
 


Title: Navy waits on U.S. OK for $125-million submarine torpedo refit
Category: Military
Posted By: Regina
Date: 2011-04-08 08:12:05
Canadian


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 108
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:16 am
 


A Liberal purchase. Spend money on shit then more money to get it operational. When its all finished it's obsolete. How about replacing the CF18 with the CF5 that was sold years ago.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:25 am
 


The submarines have had their problems which have been in the newspapers. They're custom jobs for the Brits, built in very limited numbers, and there's no maintenance infrastructure. The military know about these things. I suspect they are almost useless.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:20 pm
 


Pretty much. I hold the liberals to account for not maintaining the docks then the sub program. That being said, even if the hulls were worth it, we had to gut these things to get them up to speed. That was still cheaper then starting our own sub program like the Auzzies did, poor basturds.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:53 pm
 


I don't have good information but I know there's German, Italian and British submarines. All built in small numbers, custom jobs - for the job creation and export sale. Hopefully NATO procurement will improve with time.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:52 pm
 


gerv gerv:
A Liberal purchase. Spend money on shit then more money to get it operational. When its all finished it's obsolete. How about replacing the CF18 with the CF5 that was sold years ago.


The CF-5 (CF-116 in CF parlance) were never sold - they are in storage at CFB Meadowview.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 1:56 pm
 


Bruce_the_vii Bruce_the_vii:
I don't have good information but I know there's German, Italian and British submarines. All built in small numbers, custom jobs - for the job creation and export sale. Hopefully NATO procurement will improve with time.


Who do you think built the Victoria SSKs?

It was a major blunder buying subs that had sat untended for years, but when operational, they have proven effective. As Scape said, we could have done what Australia did and spent billions for a marginally effective submarine.

And we could have bought German, Italian or even French subs, but many of their subs are smaller than the CF wants and they would have been built overseas and shipped to us, so we would have gained nothing in the way of expertise, trade or jobs.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11108
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 3:23 pm
 


Side note. CFD Mountain View vice CFB Meadowview.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 108
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 4:46 pm
 


$1:
The CF-5 (CF-116 in CF parlance) were never sold - they are in storage at CFB Meadowview.



I do believe some aircraft were sold to Venezuela, after a being modified. The remaining airframes were put into storage at CFB Mountainview


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Fri Apr 08, 2011 5:00 pm
 


gerv gerv:
$1:
The CF-5 (CF-116 in CF parlance) were never sold - they are in storage at CFB Meadowview.



I do believe some aircraft were sold to Venezuela, after a being modified. The remaining airframes were put into storage at CFB Mountainview


Some went to Botswana as well.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.