CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:44 am
 


Title: Military scrambled over foreign sub sighting
Category: Military
Posted By: stokes
Date: 2009-03-20 07:54:12
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 9:44 am
 


This is why we need subs capable of year-round Arctic operations.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:24 pm
 


We should order some British Astute SSN's.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:28 pm
 


Yep, prime reason for subs over icebreakers.





PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:31 pm
 


Sound's like some of the natives where fishing for beluga's with dynamite again. :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:39 pm
 


saturn_656 saturn_656:
We should order some British Astute SSN's.


As nice as that would be, it simply won't happen. They wouldn't sell us Trafalgars when we looked into nuke boats in the 80s, and they won't sell these either, mainly because they are afraid the US will cut off technology transfers to them.

No, if we're going to buy them, we have to build thme ourselves or buy French ones. This is one instance where I would never suggest Russian/Chinese equipment as they are way too unsafe. The last thing we need is a 'Kursk incident' of our own.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 3598
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 12:53 pm
 


Either way we need equipmet to enforce our Arctic claims!


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 2:18 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
saturn_656 saturn_656:
We should order some British Astute SSN's.


As nice as that would be, it simply won't happen. They wouldn't sell us Trafalgars when we looked into nuke boats in the 80s, and they won't sell these either, mainly because they are afraid the US will cut off technology transfers to them.

No, if we're going to buy them, we have to build thme ourselves or buy French ones. This is one instance where I would never suggest Russian/Chinese equipment as they are way too unsafe. The last thing we need is a 'Kursk incident' of our own.



I thought Canada had greater access to US tech than the UK did?

Any links to this?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:50 pm
 


saturn_656 saturn_656:
bootlegga bootlegga:
saturn_656 saturn_656:
We should order some British Astute SSN's.


As nice as that would be, it simply won't happen. They wouldn't sell us Trafalgars when we looked into nuke boats in the 80s, and they won't sell these either, mainly because they are afraid the US will cut off technology transfers to them.

No, if we're going to buy them, we have to build thme ourselves or buy French ones. This is one instance where I would never suggest Russian/Chinese equipment as they are way too unsafe. The last thing we need is a 'Kursk incident' of our own.



I thought Canada had greater access to US tech than the UK did?

Any links to this?


There are claims to both sides of the argument;

http://byers.typepad.com/arctic/2009/03 ... laims.html

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/28/world ... wanted=all

Frankly, the argument that the USN didn't want us poking our noses around up there is more credible to me. I can't imagine either the US or UK wanting us intruding on what they likely feel as their turf.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4914
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:04 pm
 


we are going to loose the arctic if our governments don't step up to the plate. EVERYONE has acknowledged we need more monitoring and armed ice breakers etc but no one is doing anything about it. It will be to late if we weight much longer.

PS there is no way we can afford nuke subs, get over it. The Brits only have a handful of them and it is costing so much it is breaking the Navy. They are down to under 22 operational surface ships.

Sounds funny but without their carriers and subs, the Canadian Navy is almost as big. Why? nuke subs are almost prohibitively expensive to operate.


Last edited by uwish on Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12283
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:06 pm
 


Fascinating news.

Why is DND trying to bury it?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4914
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:08 pm
 


why? because then they would have to admit two things

1. their was a foreign military vessel in Canadian waters that they had ZERO knowledge of (so much for 'defending Canada')

2. they would have to admit there was FUCK ALL they could do about it.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12283
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:22 pm
 


They might also have to admit that they don't want to do anything about it.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9956
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:30 pm
 


If Harper promised to do what he was supposed to do during his election, we wouldn't have sub explosions everwhere. Deep water port, still waiting. Arctic vessals? I don't hear the 'cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war' yet.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:14 am
 


Streaker Streaker:
They might also have to admit that they don't want to do anything about it.


I seriously doubt thats the case.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  1  2  3  4  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.