[Newsbot]

Title: Liberal MP remains in caucus after charge
Category: Political
Posted By: RUEZ
Date: 2010-05-15 19:24:16
Canadian

[TuavDan]

What is it with these
Fu?ks! Once again thinking their above the law. My friend is a Police Officer in Ottawa and said that years ago, when ever they pull over an Politician or terrorist (oops)diplomat that they had to
contact the RCMP. I have to get into politics!

[kenmore]

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

[andyt]

He should get himself the same lawyer that Rahim Jaffer had.

[RUEZ]

kenmore kenmore:

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.

[kenmore]

RUEZ RUEZ:

kenmore kenmore:

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.

Absolutely.... screw the cons.

[Gunnair]

kenmore kenmore:

RUEZ RUEZ:

kenmore kenmore:

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

You only extend that courtesy to Liberals.

Absolutely.... screw the cons.

Well, at least you admit it.

Hypocrite...

[bootlegga]

andyt andyt:

He should get himself the same lawyer that Rahim Jaffer had.

[FieryVulpine]

Gunnair Gunnair:

Well, at least you admit it.

Hypocrite...

Would you expect anything less from Kenny?

[saturn_656]

kenmore kenmore:

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

He has already admitted that he failed to provide a sample, or in other words he "refused to blow".

[Gunnair]

FieryVulpine FieryVulpine:

Gunnair Gunnair:

Well, at least you admit it.

Hypocrite...

Would you expect anything less from Kenny?

Not a hope.

[Lemmy]

saturn_656 saturn_656:

kenmore kenmore:

The guilty part is still pending.. so innocent until proven otherwise

He has already admitted that he failed to provide a sample, or in other words he "refused to blow".

Not to nitpick, but "failing to provide" and "refusing to provide" are two different things. I would NEVER provide a breath sample, but I would never REFUSE to do so.

Cop: "I want you to blow in the tube"
Lemmy: "Sure thing"
Cop: "Okay, blow"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You need to blow now"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You're not blowing, you need to blow harder"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "If you don't blow, I'm going to charge you with refusing to provide a breath sample"
Lemmy: "I'm not refusing, I'm agreeing to blow. Give 'er to me, let's go"
Cop: "okay, blow"
Lemmy "okay"
etc, etc....

But seriously, the guy's entitled to a day in court before he's penalyzed. I'm pretty sure I've read that somewhere.

[saturn_656]

Lemmy Lemmy:

Not to nitpick, but "failing to provide" and "refusing to provide" are two different things. I would NEVER provide a breath sample, but I would never REFUSE to do so.

Cop: "I want you to blow in the tube"
Lemmy: "Sure thing"
Cop: "Okay, blow"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You need to blow now"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "You're not blowing, you need to blow harder"
Lemmy: "Okay"
Cop: "If you don't blow, I'm going to charge you with refusing to provide a breath sample"
Lemmy: "I'm not refusing, I'm agreeing to blow. Give 'er to me, let's go"
Cop: "okay, blow"
Lemmy "okay"
etc, etc....

But seriously, the guy's entitled to a day in court before he's penalyzed. I'm pretty sure I've read that somewhere.

I use a Breath Alcohol Tester as part of my job. I know how much air it takes. I've tried to defeat the device in training using shallow blowing, etc.

If someone honestly can't muster enough air for one of these machines they should be under medical care on a ventilator.