[Newsbot]

Title: Leftist lunacy smothers free speech at Toronto M-103 protest
Category: Political
Posted By: Alta_redneck
Date: 2017-03-08 07:29:43
Canadian

[DrCaleb]

Only Ezra could take a motion in the house that has no effect on law (or the constitution) and claim it 'smothers free speech'. Too bad there isn't enough of the story for me to see to really get a belly laugh, but the comments are plenty funny enough.

I guess the comments are what passes for a real story on The Big Bad "Rebel".

[DrCaleb]

$1:

What You Can Do

Get Premium content for only $8 a month!
Donate today to help keep The Rebel fighting!
Visit The Rebel Store to get cool swag you won't find anywhere else.
JOIN TheRebel.media FREE for more fearless news and commentary you won’t find anywhere else.
READ “Shakedown,” Ezra Levant’s book about the Canadian Human Rights Commissions, censorship and the Mohammed cartoons
Like TheRebel on Facebook
Follow TheRebel on Twitter

Oh! Those will help save your right to free speech from being smothered!

[N_Fiddledog]

So the title says "Leftist lunacy smothers free speech at Toronto M-103 protest"

And if you click it and view what's inside that's exactly what it shows.

But we're told that because somebody disagrees with the message that conveys and the internet model used to convey it the truth of the message magically loses its worth.

Yesterday we were given a different opinion and it magically became news, because apparently we are allowed to agree with that one.

http://www.canadaka.net/link.php?id=100701

We know that one is only Opinion, because that's the category the CBC has it posted under.

In that one Neil (spinmaster) MacDonald tells us the Liberal's bill M-103 is political genius, because even though he grudgingly admits there are rational arguments against it, he believes opposing it will bring out the right wing crazies and make his Liberals appear the voice of reason.

Now, because the guys on this thread who will be most critical of anybody daring to oppose that aren't going to actually click what's in the OP I'll tell you. It shows a large group of lunatic leftists screeching, pushing, and intimidating a smaller group of peaceful protesters who are against the bill.

So Neil was right that M-103 would bring out the crazies. He was wrong about which wing the crazies would represent.

However, we must remember...

Neil's opinion as news that crazed righties will take to the streets - good. Video of crazed leftists on the streets - bad.

Two legs - bad. Four legs - good ~ Animal Farm by George Orwell.

[N_Fiddledog]

Oh and seeing as opinion is news now, here's an opinion piece from an actual, for real, moderate Muslim who saw the same thing at M-103 protest Menzies did in the OP:

'Useful idiots' line up to support M-103

And btw...



(Disclaimer: Speaking of said "Morons" let's head them off and reply to the inevitable 'Hitchens wasn't the first to say that post' with a simple, so what?)

[ShepherdsDog]

Using your own tactic - 'FAKE NEWS'

[N_Fiddledog]

No that was me using the tactic of opinion as news we saw posted here yesterday in an opinion piece from Neil MacDonald. I'll assume you approved of that one, because that time you didn't complain.

In fact here is the counter to Neil in Tarek Fatah's opinion piece from the Toronto sun under the title "Useful Idiots line up to support M-103."

$1:

The term “useful idiot” has been attributed to the Russian revolutionary Vladimir Lenin, who toppled the czar in October, 1917.

Lenin’s exact word in Russian was “simpleton” to describe people in the West who served his purpose, but were neither truly aware of who was using them, nor the cause they served.

On Sunday, a blatant exhibition of “useful idiots” was on display at Toronto City Hall.

This time, they came not to serve Trotsky’s Fourth International, the Sandinistas or the Viet Cong.

This time they came to serve the cause of Islamofascism.

White youths in bandanas and facemasks roughed up Canadians, including their Muslim Canadian allies, who were protesting Liberal MP Iqra Khalid’s “Islamophobia” motion, M-103.

Among the bullied victims of the supposed anti-racist activists, who included communists and Arab Islamists, were Muslim Canadians who were pushed and kicked, their placards seized and torn, with close-up pictures of them taken by a counter protester.

“We fear our pictures were being taken to be passed on to the Pakistani Consulate in Toronto,” said Imtiaz Baloch, a small business owner who escaped Islamic tyranny three decades ago.

Said another protester named Ahmad: “I escaped Pakistan because of the jihadist threat there to liberal values. I never thought that the (jihadi) mindset I escaped, would chase me to Canada.”

Most media did not report on this bizarre nexus of communists working hand-in-hand with Arab Islamists and white anarchists.

Zaffar Jawaid, from Pakistan-occupied Balochistan said: “I have lived in peace in Canada for the last 20 years. All that changed for me on March 4, 2017 in Toronto when I decided to join the peaceful protest at the Toronto’s City Hall against Motion-103, to stop (it) from becoming a law in Canada.”

Jawaid says he had a placard that read “my fears are not irrational” when “suddenly I felt a shove on my back and was pulled back by a police officer.

“You can’t go in there” the officer said. “But that’s where I belong,” I replied.

Another Baloch protester against M-103 told me in an email: “My worst fears had come true. I was reliving the fearful days of the military-jihadist campaigns on the streets of Pakistan, and this time in Toronto.”

An Iranian who escaped the Islamist Ayatollah regime told Rebel Media:

“I am a political refugee from Iran. I’ve been to prison and I have lived under Islamic law and I know how it starts and I know how it ends. For some reason, it always starts with some unity between the left and Islamists and it scares me. I came here to be free. I chose Canada to live in a free country and I am beginning to feel scared.”

Khalid, who is the sponsor of M-103, has largely avoided the media, other than to say in Parliament that she has received Islamophobic, racist and threatening messages from opponents of M-103.

But where are the voices of Liberal Muslim MPs who know about the tyranny of Islamism, such as federal Immigration Minister Ahmed Hussen and Liberal MP Ali Ehsassi?

Gentlemen, now is the time to show real character and integrity and to stand up against the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood and Jihadi Islamism.

[DrCaleb]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Using your own tactic - 'FAKE NEWS'

Definitely. The Rebel report is so heavily biased, it has to be fake.

[N_Fiddledog]

Why is the opinion piece from Neil McDonald News, but the opinion piece from Tarek Fatah fake news?

If that's not the case why is the Rebel fake news when it is only illustrating Tarek's opinion with actual video?

Or are you saying Rebel is as fake as CBC?

[Thanos]

Probably because any worthiness of the message is getting discredited by the lack of worth of the messengers you keep using.

[N_Fiddledog]

And I'm sure that makes perfect sense to anybody who believes you are the arbiter of worth.

[herbie]

Because the opinion of someone with enough qualifications to work for what you refer to as mainstream media is more newsworthy then the opinion of someone who's only qualification is an internet account.

[N_Fiddledog]

herbie herbie:

Because the opinion of someone with enough qualifications to work for what you refer to as mainstream media is more newsworthy then the opinion of someone who's only qualification is an internet account.

I agree on part of that. I don't think your opinion is as worthy as the Toronto Sun's Tareq Fatah's, or for that matter the OP's David Menzies

[N_Fiddledog]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

herbie herbie:

Because the opinion of someone with enough qualifications to work for what you refer to as mainstream media is more newsworthy then the opinion of someone who's only qualification is an internet account.

I agree on part of that. I don't think your opinion is as worthy as the Toronto Sun's Tareq Fatah's, or for that matter the OP's David Menzies

Come to think of it though, that doesn't actually matter, does it? Because you have no intention of ever discussing the actual issue of the thread or even pretending it interests you.

[fifeboy]

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Why is the opinion piece from Neil McDonald News, but the opinion piece from Tarek Fatah fake news?

If that's not the case why is the Rebel fake news when it is only illustrating Tarek's opinion with actual video?

Or are you saying Rebel is as fake as CBC?

If it's not news, than why is it in the opinion section at the CBC website?