CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:20 am
 


Title: F-35 jets purchase not guaranteed: Fantino
Category: Military
Posted By: Curtman
Date: 2012-03-13 11:17:01
Canadian





PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:20 am
 


$1:
Despite standing as one of the world's strongest supporters of the troubled F-35 and fighting an election, in part, on obtaining the aircraft, Associate Defence Minister Julian Fantino admitted Tuesday the Conservative government hasn't ruled out walking away from the stealth fighter program.

Responding to NDP questions during an appearance before the Commons' defence committee, Fantino said the government remains supportive of the F-35, but the government had not made "the determinate decision" on whether it will purchase the F-35, and that it had not "discounted backing out."

Fantino also confirmed the government doesn't know how much each stealth fighter will cost.

"We can't give you that definitive number now," he said.


This is hilarious. They knew exactly how much they would cost 1 year ago, and insisted the price was locked in.

$1:
Stephen Harper says he stands by his cost estimate for the F-35 stealth fighters.

The prime minister made the declaration Wednesday, even though the Pentagon's latest estimate for the version of the fighter jet Canada intends to buy is double what the Conservative government has projected.

In defending the $9-billion sticker price, Canada's Defence Department has said it will pay between US$70 million and US$75 million for each aircraft, a figure that the parliamentary budget officer has disputed.

The Pentagon recently projected it will pay $151 million for each aircraft for the F-35A, the standard runway take-off and landing version of the fighter bomber.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office, crunching numbers earlier this month, pegged the cost between $110 million and $115 million per plane. But defence experts said that report doesn't take into account recent changes to the program.

Harper says there are cost increases in the U.S. program that have no impact on Canada and he's confident of the numbers he's been given by officials.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:24 am
 


Just like they insisted they wouldn't cut and run from Astan.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 11:35 am
 


Sorry to say, but your chances of building the Arrow are better than that of ever seeing the F-35 in production. That plane is just a curse and a massive black hole for money.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4039
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:24 pm
 


We need to spring for the SuperHornets. It's the most logical course of action.

-J.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:56 pm
 


CDN_PATRIOT CDN_PATRIOT:
We need to spring for the SuperHornets. It's the most logical course of action.

-J.


Agreed.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:02 pm
 


CDN_PATRIOT CDN_PATRIOT:
We need to spring for the SuperHornets. It's the most logical course of action.

-J.


If we are looking at alternatives, I think the Typhoon should be considered. While it isn't stealthy like the F-35, no other alternatives are. It also is a little more modern than the Hornet Mark 2.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:47 pm
 


saturn_656 saturn_656:
CDN_PATRIOT CDN_PATRIOT:
We need to spring for the SuperHornets. It's the most logical course of action.

-J.


If we are looking at alternatives, I think the Typhoon should be considered. While it isn't stealthy like the F-35, no other alternatives are. It also is a little more modern than the Hornet Mark 2.


Someone will have a hay-day with this one, the Pak Fa. It's cheaper, should be ready by our required 2018-2020 time frame, and Russia is looking for buyers (keep in mind they don't care who they sell their weapons too) and very likely would be willing to let us build most the damned thing here if we wanted too.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2074
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:06 am
 


Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
saturn_656 saturn_656:
CDN_PATRIOT CDN_PATRIOT:
We need to spring for the SuperHornets. It's the most logical course of action.

-J.


If we are looking at alternatives, I think the Typhoon should be considered. While it isn't stealthy like the F-35, no other alternatives are. It also is a little more modern than the Hornet Mark 2.


Someone will have a hay-day with this one, the Pak Fa. It's cheaper, should be ready by our required 2018-2020 time frame, and Russia is looking for buyers (keep in mind they don't care who they sell their weapons too) and very likely would be willing to let us build most the damned thing here if we wanted too.

Only problem is how do you tell friend from foe?


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 298
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:27 am
 


The F-35 has been an overhyped cash hole for years and the Cons are just starting to realize that. Funny. Wonder they'll realize they should start focusing on all those defense related projects for that northen sovereingty drumbeat they've been singing for years.

I say dump the damn F-35 already and open up an international competition with the likes of the Indian MMRCA.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:33 am
 


gonavy47 gonavy47:
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
Someone will have a hay-day with this one, the Pak Fa. It's cheaper, should be ready by our required 2018-2020 time frame, and Russia is looking for buyers (keep in mind they don't care who they sell their weapons too) and very likely would be willing to let us build most the damned thing here if we wanted too.

Only problem is how do you tell friend from foe?


I'd assume the same way we always have. Don't modern fighters still carry transponders for identification by other units as friendly? I don't see why one couldn't be installed.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:35 pm
 


Ya its called IFF (Identify Friend or Foe) and its been around in the US for about 20 years. Pretty sure RCAF only got it for CF18s in the last upgrade a few years ago tho. I wouldny mind Typhoon or Super Hornet. Never really liked the looks of delta-wings tho.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:44 pm
 


IFF was around in the Battle of Britain.

http://www.battleofbritain1940.net/document-14.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15681
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:46 pm
 


Shadow_Flanker Shadow_Flanker:
The F-35 has been an overhyped cash hole for years and the Cons are just starting to realize that. Funny. Wonder they'll realize they should start focusing on all those defense related projects for that northen sovereingty drumbeat they've been singing for years.

I say dump the damn F-35 already and open up an international competition with the likes of the Indian MMRCA.


My plan B would be the F18 E/F. Makes more sense than a dodgy Russian or Indian aircraft.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 8:54 pm
 


Interesting. That sounds like a one-way ground-air system though but im sure an early precursor. Current IFF allows the pilot to "interrogate" a targeted aircraft or ground vehicle prior to firing on it.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  1  2  3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.