andyt andyt:
Millikan for instance - seems to still have lots of money. Has he paid back every cent he stole?
Milken's insider trading convictions are questionable. Not saying I love the guy, just that the real 'crime' he committed was in being an outsider to the Wall Street community who made the mistake of making the old guard look like fools. He made money on market segments that the old guard traditionally ignored and held in contempt.
I forget who it was, but one of his buddies escaped to Switzerland and when the US tried to extradite him the Swiss courts found that the evidence was wholly inadequate to justify the US request. I remember a couple of IRS agents ended up in a Swiss prison for trying to steal bank information about the guy.
Over the years I've observed that the SEC uses insider trading charges sort of the same way street cops use 'resisting arrest' when they can't find anything else to go with. Insider trading charges are rarely supported by documentary evidence and instead are often based on the same level of 'evidence' as charges of witchcraft once were.
It's also notable that the government often asserts in court that the fact that someone made money on an unusual gambit is 'proof' of a crime.
Even myself, I was questioned about why I purchased MCI WorldCom when they were in bankruptcy ten years ago. The shares were trading at US$0.21 per share and I read a bankruptcy court document that had been published that if the company liquidated then the liquidation value was going to be $4.37 per share...making this a pretty attractive gamble.
I bought 100,000 shares (not a lot of money, really) and sold when the stock rebounded to $5 per share. Which I regret given that today it is trading at $16.96 per share.