CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:36 pm
 


Title: Drunk passengers likely caused deadly plane crash off Vancouver Island: report
Category: Health
Posted By: andyt
Date: 2011-06-24 13:35:06


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:36 pm
 


According to the report, toxicology tests showed all three passengers were highly intoxicated and were so drunk that they likely didn't realize the seriousness of the situation in time to allow the pilot to regain control of the plane.


Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
Profile
Posts: 32460
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:42 pm
 


Yup........that's what it said.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:45 pm
 


I was going to make a racist remark till I remembered that there have been plenty of non-native drunks who have caused trouble on planes. Still, if these people were so drunk, they shouldn't have been allowed on the plane. And I bet the native band will come out with a statement that it's racist to mention that they were drunk.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4765
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:59 am
 


Alcohol kills.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
 Vancouver Canucks
Profile
Posts: 130
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:03 pm
 


andyt andyt:
...if these people were so drunk, they shouldn't have been allowed on the plane......

That's what I wonder about-the pilot's judgement.

I mean if a cab driver can legally refuse to drive someone who's drunk or abusive surely an airplane pilot has the same power-why didn't he say No?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:48 pm
 


Barilko Barilko:
andyt andyt:
...if these people were so drunk, they shouldn't have been allowed on the plane......

That's what I wonder about-the pilot's judgement.

I mean if a cab driver can legally refuse to drive someone who's drunk or abusive surely an airplane pilot has the same power-why didn't he say No?


They were already turned away by a water taxi for being too drunk. If a boat won't take them, what's airline flying them for? Apparently the excuse what that they were still able to walk and argue about the price of the charter.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 12:59 pm
 


The fun part is that if the pilot had refused to take them because they were too pissed-up then they would have started screaming racism at him. I assume that Natives in the area probably made up a sizable portion of his typical customers so if they hit him up with the racism accusation then it would have done some significant damage to his business income if other Natives stopped using his services as a form of backlash. He probably also figured that the worst that would happen with some drunks would be that he'd have had to hose some puke off of the cabin floor. And I'm fairly certain that most pilots usually operate with bit of confidence that their passengers probably aren't going to go insane and attack them while they're flying.

No way this guy could have won with customers like that. His dying because of them was unfortunately the worst of all possible outcomes that were created the moment three useless drunken assholes entered into his life. Terribly sad of course but, with this being Canada and all, there's no way the ones who deserve all the blame in this are going to receive it. They just don't have the same rights as the rest of us, remember, they also have "special" rights just because of their ancestry and skin pigmentation.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:18 pm
 


Good point.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:31 pm
 


I'm not convinced by this report, myself. They reached this by process of elimination and there seems to be no proof.
$1:
Drunken passengers likely interfered...
Yearwood confirmed nobody really knows what happened before the crash...


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:34 pm
 


Well, maybe you should write your own report.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:43 pm
 


andyt andyt:
Well, maybe you should write your own report.

Wow... where did that one come from.

You in a pissy mood, Andyt?
If so, don't take it out on others.

That was an opinion.
If you don't agree, no problem... but stay nice, if you can.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:47 pm
 


raydan raydan:
andyt andyt:
Well, maybe you should write your own report.

Wow... where did that one come from.

You in a pissy mood, Andyt?
If so, don't take it out on others.

That was an opinion.
If you don't agree, no problem... but stay nice, if you can.


Feeling thenthitive today?

The report is the best guess of what happened. You're not convinced, that's fine, but you have no evidence that anything else occurred.

$1:
"We found that if the pilot in front was not expecting it, and you pushed him forward, and their elbows bent, they didn't have the strength to overcome the push from a leg that's extended," said Yearwood.
"That was the last remaining possibility."


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35270
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:54 pm
 


andyt andyt:
The report is the best guess of what happened. You're not convinced, that's fine, but you have no evidence that anything else occurred.

And they have no evidence that's what happened.

We can go around this circle for awhile, but no, I'm done.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 1:55 pm
 


raydan raydan:
And they have no evidence that's what happened.


Nor did they claim to. Just gave their best guess because they eliminated every other possibility they could think of. So what does it mean you're not convinced? If you have no contrary evidence, then the best guess seems to be the one to go with, no?


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.