N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
What I don't understand is if the Chief can't release the video because it might prejudice an open court case, why can he offer open opinion on what's in the video. Isn't that actually more prejudicial, in that it offers authority to a particular opinion of what might be in the video?
Exactly. So instead of the entire world seeing the video and making their own judgement, he prejudices the interpretation of a video while not allowing anyone to see it. It is HE that is hiding behind the fact that it is court evidence, not the mayor...or else he would not have had a press conference to mention the video at all.
I am glad that enough people are understanding what is at stake here. Some of us regular folk have already experienced interference in our lives without the courtesy of a charge or even an accusation; many of those in the security apparatus (and more specifically those in leadership positions) have run interference with rights, legal norms and the democratic integrity of the system forever. Does anything think this entire charade is for the "benefit of the people"? Right. It doesn't fly based on Blair's leadership record over the last few years.
I say this without a shred of dishonestly, I expect the same Rights and processes to be in place for all levels of government, for all provinces and their respected democratically elected leaders and most importantly for all citizens.