N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
"Ostensibly, this sets back globalism concepts, which seek to eliminate tit-for-tat tariffs which are the inevitable result when countries go unilateral on their trade policy. Ultimately, the imposition, collection and reconciliation of such taxes only adds to the red tape and costs of cross-border trade."
Were we really doing so bad before NAFTA?
Honestly. I don't know.
We weren't doing bad, because we had a few deals like the Auto Pact, but we were always worried that a lobby group would convince Congress to become protectionist and lock us out of the US market. That happened a number of times over agricultural goods, lumber, and other resources.
FTA (and later NAFTA) were supposed to provide certainty for industry on both sides of the border. It protected us so that we had secure access to the US market and ensured that US industry had access to no tariff raw materials.
I've read that if Trump does back out of NAFTA, FTA is supposed to kick in, but I honestly don't know if that's true or not. Of course, if it does, Trump can probably back out of that one too.
The next four years may be very difficult for Canada.