Hyack Hyack:
$1:
Fifty-one soldiers have been injured and five others killed when the Light Armoured Vehicle III they were riding in rolled over
It seems to me the LAV 3 definitely has a stability problem, yet the brass seem to think there is no problem with it....
$1:
Asked about the record of the LAV-3, Mialkowski said he is confident the vehicles are safe.
The colonel said he personally drove the same model for eight months during a tour of duty in Afghanistan.
"It is a very reliable vehicle, and it's been the workhorse of our army for close to two decades."
It must have something to do with the Ostrich Effect.....

Kind of difficult for me to have an unbiased opinion now, and I don't want to allude that this was why the accident occured, but I don't think you're wrong. The LAV-6 upgrade was a mistake. We should have purchased modified CV 90-30s and sent the whole wheeled vehicle fleet to the militia, or sold them off as surplus.
Funny thing is, the primary reason why it is as narrow as it is, is because we wanted it to fit in a herc. That said, it's too tall to fit into a herc without removing the turret anyway. Now that we have C-17s, I believe the Herc width requirements are redundant, and that we should transition to the wider, shorter, tracked vehicle platform I mentioned above.