DerbyX DerbyX:
Boy you are testy tonight.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Too bad I don't support either party eh? Wow, I have you thinking I'm pro CPC and others thinking I'm pro Liberal, all because neither of you can see past your own partisanship. Pathetic.
DerbyX DerbyX:
Actually sunshine I'm well aware of your political agenda. You just think you are smarter then everybody and can run the country much better then all the politicians. Think again.
Ohh is that what I think? Well princess, we know yer real name now, it's the Amazing Kreskin. Quick, what number am I thinking of?
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
I've hammered Iggy, Harper, Layton, Mulroney, Chretien and Martin equally in this forum. How you could possibly think I have more "love" for the CPC and Harper is beyond me.
DerbyX DerbyX:
I don't sunshine. I just responded to you crying about the Liberals and my comment was intended as much for the forum at large as you. The people who switch from "Damn Liberals" to "damn government" know who they are.
Nice backpeddle considering you quoted ME before espousing your "wisdom" to the great unwashed masses.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Oh wait, it's partisanship..Anyone that says anything negative about the Libs MUST be a right wing supporter right? Regardless of whether they slam the CPC as well.
Come Derby, join me in the enlightened age where a person doesn't have to support one party over the other. Where people question the gov't's morals, actions and ethics regardless of which party is in power.
DerbyX DerbyX:
Nope. I've had many conversations with NDPers who have few kind words to say about the Libs. You are just having a bit of a moment here since you are getting hammered on other threads and you have a personal grudge against me.
Hmmm I'm getting hammered in other threads? Wow, you and I have a HUGE difference in what being hammered entails. As far as a personal grudge goes, we have our BIG differences of opinion on religion and /or God, if you've taken it personally, that's your problem, not mine.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Let me put it this way, if there was a federal Marijuana Party member in my riding, I'd vote for them. IF, by some fluke the party got elected to lead, don't think for one minute I'm not gonna shit on them if they keep fucking around and don't do their jobs.
DerbyX DerbyX:
Let me put it this way. You will eventually shit on them since you have no understanding about what they do nor how it gets done. You will put unreasonable expectations on them then shit on them when they can't meet it.
Yep, yer right, handing our country over to foreign interests a la Mulroney and Harper, screwing our veterans a la pretty much every PM that's been in power, handing out billions of dollars for nothing a la Chretien and Harper and so on ad nauseum. I'm very unreasonable being disgusted about that.
I should be ashamed of myself for not having the same low expectations of gov't you do.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
The difference between you and me in this matter Derby is, I'm willing to call a spade a spade, no matter who or what. You, on the other hand appear at least, to prefer to call a lump of coal a diamond in anticipation that it WILL eventually become one with enough pressure and heat.
DerbyX DerbyX:
No you aren't. You have your biases and they are religious in scope. You are willing to call a spade a spade when its some big church but when you get into the core of your beliefs you will kick and scream and call it anything but a spade.
Got any leftover straw from that argument? Rumplestiltskin is over and I'd like to get some gold thread. So my core beliefs in God and Christ are wrong cuz YOU say there's no such people/entities. And you accuse me of thinking I'm smarter than everyone else. Funny stuff that.
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
The reason I singled out the Bosnia issue was because it was a particularily assholish move on ANYBODY'S part, regardless of their political bent.
DerbyX DerbyX:
I don't care why you did it. It was a partisan asshole move to bitch about a former PM not responsible for the actions of the current PM in a thread about those very actions. It did make you sound very much like ridenrain who responded to every single criticism thrown at Harper with a scathing red herring about the Liberals.
Yeah, that's right, hospital beds for veterans ONLY became a problem after Harper got in office.
Mulroney passed the buck to Chretien, who passed the buck to Martin, who passed the buck to Harper, who will most assuredly pass the buck to the next person and so on and so on.
Get it yet???? This has been an ongoing problem for wayyy to long now. A lack of beds pales in comparison to firing the man who was going to HELP our veterans get the proper care and treatment they deserve. Did you ever stop to think (pardon the exaggeration) that if the THEN Defense Minister had been allowed to do his part, a lack of beds might not be an issue now?
PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
If Mulroney had done it instead, it wouldn't have changed the fact that I would have still made my original post about the absolute disgusting regard in which our veterans are treated by some! Actually, my vehemence might have been even less curtailed considering the supposedly friendly attitude the right has towards the military.
The only distinct hypocricy I can see, is coming from you.
DerbyX DerbyX:
That is because you didn't bother to read and understand.

What's to understand? Yer a partisan liberal hack. No surprises there.