CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:11 pm
 


Title: Canada�s pullout from F-35 program will boost costs for other nations by as much as $1M per jet
Category: Military
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2015-10-24 13:54:26
Canadian


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:11 pm
 


Good


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10503
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:01 pm
 


The fighter is a $1.1 trillion piece of dog shit.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:05 pm
 


Are there other Nations interested in it still?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:57 pm
 


No objection from me at all if we withdraw entirely from this white elephant. Buy a couple hundred Super Bugs for the next twenty odd years of interim until the F35 has the kinks worked out. In time it will be a terrific plane but the first couple of generations of it are going to be a hyper-expensive nightmare. It's never good to deal with a monopoly and that's what Lockheed's unfortunately been turning into.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 9445
PostPosted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 10:58 pm
 


Image
The Viper would have been a better investment.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14747
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 1:59 am
 


Thanos Thanos:
No objection from me at all if we withdraw entirely from this white elephant. Buy a couple hundred Super Bugs for the next twenty odd years of interim until the F35 has the kinks worked out. In time it will be a terrific plane but the first couple of generations of it are going to be a hyper-expensive nightmare. It's never good to deal with a monopoly and that's what Lockheed's unfortunately been turning into.


It's dead. The new PM said he was gonna cancel the contract and build us new ships instead. So, I wait with bated breath for all the shiny new tankers, icebreakers, Frigates and Command and Control Destroyers as promised. :P


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10503
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:29 am
 


I thought the Navy opted for the hybrid Frigate Destroyer


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12398
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 8:50 am
 


BRAH BRAH:
Image
The Viper would have been a better investment.


A craft with air intakes and stubby wings for use in the vacuum of space. :wink:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:04 pm
 


llama66 llama66:
I thought the Navy opted for the hybrid Frigate Destroyer


No, they are planning on building a common hull (larger than either the Iroquois or Halifax hulls) and fitting them with different weapons systems depending on their role (FFH or DDH).

http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/business-equ ... atant.page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Cl ... nt_Project


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 6642
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 4:52 am
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
llama66 llama66:
I thought the Navy opted for the hybrid Frigate Destroyer


No, they are planning on building a common hull (larger than either the Iroquois or Halifax hulls) and fitting them with different weapons systems depending on their role (FFH or DDH).

http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/business-equ ... atant.page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Cl ... nt_Project


Is Trudeau supportive of this plan? Will he keep the hull numbers at 15?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 33561
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 6:30 am
 


AS the ships are imaginary things that no Canadian government has any intention of building then they can make up any number of them that they want. Why stop at fifteen? They should say they're going to build fifty of them, finish one, then cancel the program entirely when the costs inevitably spiral wildly out of control.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Montreal Canadiens
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33691
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:05 am
 


Thanos Thanos:
AS the ships are imaginary things that no Canadian government has any intention of building then they can make up any number of them that they want. Why stop at fifteen? They should say they're going to build fifty of them, finish one, then cancel the program entirely when the costs inevitably spiral wildly out of control.


:lol: :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:18 am
 


Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind:
bootlegga bootlegga:
llama66 llama66:
I thought the Navy opted for the hybrid Frigate Destroyer


No, they are planning on building a common hull (larger than either the Iroquois or Halifax hulls) and fitting them with different weapons systems depending on their role (FFH or DDH).

http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/business-equ ... atant.page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Cl ... nt_Project


Is Trudeau supportive of this plan? Will he keep the hull numbers at 15?


I don't think they ever quoted a definitive number, but he did mention several times that cost savings from the F-35 would go to building new ships for the Navy - and it was re-iterated by Andrew Leslie (likely the new Defence Minister) on election night.


$1:
A Liberal government would not purchase F-35 fighter jets to replace Canada’s aging CF-18s and instead buy cheaper planes, saving money that would go primarily towards the navy, party leader Justin Trudeau said Sunday.

...

Trudeau also promised to reduce the size of administration in the Department of National Defence, but he would not say if that meant members of the forces would be laid off.

The military needs “more teeth and less tail,” he said, meaning more money for frontline resources and less on bureaucracy.

He added that he would also immediately launch a review of military spending, but promised to maintain current National Defence funding levels as well as planned increases.



http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/pol ... e26446887/


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:21 am
 


PluggyRug PluggyRug:
BRAH BRAH:
Image
The Viper would have been a better investment.


A craft with air intakes and stubby wings for use in the vacuum of space. :wink:


They also were seen to operate in atmospheric environments so the stubby wings were useful at times. Sort of like the space shuttle.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.