$1:
"Let's say if they didn't have enough fuel, or if there was not enough food or water on board," he said. "At some point there is a moral or ethical responsibility to say we can't simply send them away."
- When spending $50 K per person to process them alone, never mind the settlement costs, I think we can afford some water and fuel.
$1:
Canada is obliged to not return people to their home country if they face persecution there under an agreement signed in the ..blah blah blah some unenforceable UN agreement
If we can’t prove who they are and they have no docs they can’t prove they will be persecuted nor can we confirm their stories so back they go.
$1:
Far more asylum seekers actually arrive in Canada by plane and land-crossing each year to claim refugee status than by perilous sea journey, but they don't usually turn up on the public radar, Watson said.
So what? What kind of argument is this? “More people get in another way so we should allow these people? A pretty lame argument!
$1:
some people bluntly suggesting the migrants aren't wanted here.
Just some eh? This is the type of professor I’d have to take a bunch of gravol before doing his assignments in order to BS to the way he thinks in order to get a good grade.
$1:
Public Safety Minister Vic Toews has repeatedly said those among the group found guilty of criminal acts will be prosecuted.
How would you know? They won’t be using their real names but you know what? They did break the law when they entered the country illegally so now they are criminals, so off with them back home, sorry, it’s the law. I’m not anti immigrant I’m anti skipping the queue of honest and patient immigrants.
$1:
Canadian authorities say they knew for more than two months the ship was coming. Still, Canada didn't have the legal authority to board the MV Sun Sea in international waters to arrest suspected terrorists.
Why not? Israel can.
Ugh, pretty much every comment and argument in that article is worthless and invalid so I'm not bothering to continue.
CKA Uber 
