CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:30 am
 


Title: Burning poppy photo: Man arrested for posting image on Twitter
Category: Military
Posted By: Newfy
Date: 2012-11-13 02:11:08


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2491
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:30 am
 


Funny how all the news reports left out the bit where he posted "How about that you squaddie c***s!" It may not be illegal to burn Poppies, but to post it in a public forum with that statement is surely malicious and could even be inciting violence.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 4:56 am
 


The fucknut was likely taken into protective custody.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:15 am
 


Newfy Newfy:
Funny how all the news reports left out the bit where he posted "How about that you squaddie c***s!" It may not be illegal to burn Poppies, but to post it in a public forum with that statement is surely malicious and could even be inciting violence.


If we had the same laws in Canada, most of us here would be in jail.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:48 am
 


If someone was to burn something important to certain cultures, it would be instantly labelled as a hate crime.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:53 am
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
If someone was to burn something important to certain cultures, it would be instantly labelled as a hate crime.


Can you give an example?


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2103
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:13 am
 


News items mention that veterans might be happy about the charges... but would they be?

I would say that many of them might think that incidents like this are perpetrated by cranks, who will be censured in the court of public opinion anyway, and thus taken care of WITHOUT state intervention. State control (dictatorship) and its curtailment of freedoms (including the freedom to do stupid things) is the thing they fought against.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:58 am
 


andyt andyt:
OnTheIce OnTheIce:
If someone was to burn something important to certain cultures, it would be instantly labelled as a hate crime.


Can you give an example?


If I go and spray paint "Iran will burn" on the outside of a monument celebrating Iranians, it would be a hate crime. If I spray painted the same on a Mosque, it would also be a hate crime.

If an Iranian writes "Canada Will Burn" on a Canadian monument, or on a United Church, it's just vandalism.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:06 am
 


Did an Iranian do so? Got a link or something?

Did anybody spray paint "Iran will burn" on anything and get charged with a hate crime, or are you just making stuff up? Specifics would help here.

Actually, AFAIK, hateful messages against nations are not classified as hate crimes. Writing Iranians or Canadians will burn might be deemed a threat or incitement to violence, don't think it would be deemed a hate crime.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:13 pm
 


andyt andyt:
Did an Iranian do so? Got a link or something?

Did anybody spray paint "Iran will burn" on anything and get charged with a hate crime, or are you just making stuff up? Specifics would help here.

Actually, AFAIK, hateful messages against nations are not classified as hate crimes. Writing Iranians or Canadians will burn might be deemed a threat or incitement to violence, don't think it would be deemed a hate crime.


Yep, blinders are fully on.

I guess cause nothing of the sort happens in your neck of the woods, it wouldn't happen and it would be stupid for anyone to suggest that.

Just a few samples of the double standard:

Church = "Vandalized"
http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/ ... cle/217035

Mosque = "Hate Crime"
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/st ... crime.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:16 pm
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
/quote]

Yep, blinders are fully on.

I guess cause nothing of the sort happens in your neck of the woods, it wouldn't happen and it would be stupid for anyone to suggest that.

Just a few samples of the double standard:

Church = "Vandalized"
http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/ ... cle/217035

Mosque = "Hate Crime"
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/st ... crime.html


From your own link about the vandalized church:
$1:
"As a result of the language that was used, it is considered a hate crime," Toronto police Const. Tony Vella said.
Do you only read the headlines?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:20 pm
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
andyt andyt:
Did an Iranian do so? Got a link or something?

Did anybody spray paint "Iran will burn" on anything and get charged with a hate crime, or are you just making stuff up? Specifics would help here.

Actually, AFAIK, hateful messages against nations are not classified as hate crimes. Writing Iranians or Canadians will burn might be deemed a threat or incitement to violence, don't think it would be deemed a hate crime.


Yep, blinders are fully on.

I guess cause nothing of the sort happens in your neck of the woods, it wouldn't happen and it would be stupid for anyone to suggest that.

Just a few samples of the double standard:

Church = "Vandalized"
http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/ ... cle/217035

Mosque = "Hate Crime"
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/st ... crime.html


Well, outside of a group calling for an investigation to determine if the attack on the mosque was a hate crime that would a poor comparison. The pastor in the first example could have asked for the same but apparently did not.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:23 pm
 


andyt andyt:
Do you only read the headlines?


Is that all you had to offer?

Yes, I read the articles but do you really thing headlines don't matter? When you sell the same act as two different things, you're pushing forth your PC agenda.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:26 pm
 


So you've got your knickers in a knot because two different editors used different headlines? That's what all your fussing is about. Or as you said, is that all you have to offer?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23565
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:33 pm
 


andyt andyt:
So you've got your knickers in a knot because two different editors used different headlines? That's what all your fussing is about. Or as you said, is that all you have to offer?


Expect a very sharp rebuke once he changes his manties.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  1  2  3  4  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.