CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:09 am
 


Title: Buffet: Rich Should Pay Higher Taxes
Category: Business
Posted By: BeaverFever
Date: 2010-11-22 22:45:23


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17037
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:09 am
 


And Warren Buffet continues to show why he is an excellent human being. *applauds*


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23093
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:16 am
 


R=UP

Now if he can only convince the rest of the world's millionaires/billionaires to be as generous.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:39 am
 


WTF are you posting this now for? I already posted all this stuff, only to be assured by every Joe the Plumber on his forum that it would never work because the rich will just move their money to other jurisdictions.

But if you think Buffet is alone:

$1:
Rich Germans demand higher taxes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8321967.stm

$1:
Bill Gates, Sr., others meet in North Admiral, demand higher taxes for the wealthy
http://www.westseattleherald.com/2010/05/04/news/bill-gates-sr-others-meet-north-admiral-demand-higher-taxes-wealthy

$1:
They've been taxed to the hilt by Labour. Now Dave, George and Nick (who live in a different financial universe) want to squeeze those on £40,000 a year even harder


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1318341/David-Cameron-George-Osborne-want-tax-rich-harder.html#ixzz167m51tvg That's Dave as in Cameron.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11362
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 12:14 pm
 


Dude's obviously a Commie!


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11108
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:10 pm
 


I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:19 pm
 


SprCForr SprCForr:
I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:21 pm
 


He paid 19% of taxes while making billions while people earning a 'fair' income had higher rates.

Maybe the problem is more HOW they tax. The taxation system in the States looks fucked up.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 21611
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 4:31 pm
 


:|


Last edited by Public_Domain on Sat Feb 22, 2025 11:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1681
PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2010 9:58 pm
 


Taxing the rich more wont fix the big problem, all the good jobs are being outsourced. Doesn't matter how much you tax the population if more money is leaving the economy than coming in.

If Buffet wants to help he can donate billions of his money a year to schools and roads etc.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11108
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:47 am
 


andyt andyt:
SprCForr SprCForr:
I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.


I know, he's been talking about this for a while now. IMHO he should write an update to his book.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:53 am
 


SprCForr SprCForr:
andyt andyt:
SprCForr SprCForr:
I'd be impressed if they just paid what they owed instead of all the hiding and loophole nonsense.


That's actually Buffet's point - he pays a lower tax rate than his receptionist because of various tax dodges available to him.


I know, he's been talking about this for a while now. IMHO he should write an update to his book.


I don't really get it tho. He paid tax on a lot more money than the secretary - so if the income is higher, shouldn't the tax rate he paid on it be higher too? I understand having various tax dodges that reduce net income, but not how you pay a lower rate on higher earnings.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11108
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:18 am
 


Through the incentives passed to those in a particular tax bracket I presume. How exactly the US system works, I don't know enough to say.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 33492
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:49 am
 


Every tax system is at least nominally progressive - ie the rate goes up on higher incomes. So it really makes no sense that he paid a lower rate on much higher income than his secretary. Maybe his income was capital gains and there's a special, lower, tax rate on that.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23093
PostPosted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:18 pm
 


andyt andyt:
I don't really get it tho. He paid tax on a lot more money than the secretary - so if the income is higher, shouldn't the tax rate he paid on it be higher too? I understand having various tax dodges that reduce net income, but not how you pay a lower rate on higher earnings.


My guess would be that his higher income/wealth level allows him the opportunity to take advantage of things most people can't afford.

For example, every Canadian is entitled to put $5000 each year into a TFSA, but how many people can afford to do that every year? Certainly those earning 6 figures probably can, but a single mom with a kid or two making $40,000 a year can't. Same goes for RRSPs. Canadians are allowed to bank 18% of their income (to a maximum of $20,000 or something) each year. But how many do that? most people put in a $1000 or two just before they send in their taxes to get a bigger return and that's all.

I do know that mortgage interest in the US is a write-off on your taxes, so if Buffet has a huge house with big mortgage payments (I don't know but I doubt it given his own financial acumen), while his secretary has a small house with smaller payments, then right there he would get a larger tax break than she would.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.