news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Hagel to call for shrinking Army to pre-WWII si

Canadian Content
20681news upnews down

Hagel to call for shrinking Army to pre-WWII size


Military | 206811 hits | Feb 24 7:51 am | Posted by: saturn_656
40 Comment

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is expected to call Monday for shrinking the U.S. Army to its smallest size since 1940, among other cuts, drawing criticism that the drastic changes will hurt U.S. security.

Comments

  1. by avatar saturn_656
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 4:40 pm
    Officials told the Times that Hagel's plan has been endorsed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and protects funding for Special Operations forces and cyberwarfare. It also calls for the Navy to maintain all 11 of its aircraft carriers currently in operation. However, the budget proposal mandates the elimination of the entire fleet of Air Force A-10 attack aircraft, as well as the retiring of the U-2 spy plane, a stalwart of Cold War operations.


    The A-10 seems to have a bullseye painted on its back

  2. by avatar commanderkai
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:00 pm
    NOOOOOOOOO! Not the A-10! Seriously, the plane is a sexy beast.

  3. by avatar BRAH
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 5:11 pm
    With the moves Putin is making the Cold War is back in business.

  4. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:18 pm
    Wow, cutting 100,000 from the military. That's a lot of vets with a specific skill set.

  5. by avatar saturn_656
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 7:42 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    NOOOOOOOOO! Not the A-10! Seriously, the plane is a sexy beast.


    Not to mention ridiculously survivable and effective in its role. I'd like to see the F-35 absorb 57mm cannon fire and keep on trucking.

  6. by avatar xerxes
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:16 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    NOOOOOOOOO! Not the A-10! Seriously, the plane is a sexy beast.


    They must be phasing it out because it's combat and cost effective.

  7. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:55 pm
    Those Navy carrier groups are the key to their power.

    Now, if our own government could figure out the potential flexibility, mobility of the Navy and how relatively easy it is to project power from quality ships ...

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:34 pm
    "Jabberwalker" said
    Those Navy carrier groups are the key to their power.


    Maybe that's why Obozo wants the Navy cut down to four carrier groups.

  9. by avatar commanderkai
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:43 pm
    I don't see the A-10 going anywhere. It'll be the B-52 of CAS aircraft, existing for decades upon decades.

  10. by avatar Jabberwalker
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:45 pm
    I'll bet that at any given time, you have at least 3 carrier groups at sea, all in or near potential trouble spots ... the Strait of Hormuz, The Med., The South China Sea, for example. Ha anyone told him that to keep a continuous presence, you will need something like 8-9 carriers ... for every one at sea, one in work-up and one in re-fit. You might be able to push it to 6 or 7 but not without diminishing your reach pretty substantially and kicking the crap out of your personnel.

  11. by avatar saturn_656
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:44 pm
    Carriers are being left alone for now, but many authors seem to write as if the USN still had 11 CVN's.

    They're already down to 10, and apparently George Washington's refuelling has not been funded.

    11 Guided Missile Cruisers, half the cruiser force, will be mothballed.

    All three services are being "Obummered".

  12. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:53 pm
    "saturn_656" said
    Carriers are being left alone for now, but many authors seem to write as if the USN still had 11 CVN's.

    They're already down to 10, and apparently George Washington's refuelling has not been funded.


    We're effectively down to six carriers right now given that four of the ten you cited are alongside at Bremerton and Newport News awaiting various services.

  13. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:04 pm
    close down most foreign bases, and invest the savings in carrier groups which are essentially mobile bases that can project American power anywhere in the world within a week or two. Subic Bay should be kept for operations in eastern Asia and the western Pacific. The Japanese should also be encouraged to build up and counter the Chinese, Norks and Russians.

  14. by avatar saturn_656
    Mon Feb 24, 2014 11:09 pm
    Subic Bay was shut down in '92.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2 3

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net