"saturn_656" said What good is that speed when data caps are low and overage charges cost an arm and a leg?
Because Rogers, Bell, and Telus can now point to this story when anybody even thinks about comparing US cell companies and Canadian ones. "Oh but we have better speeds! NOW FORK OVER YOUR FIRST BORN."
"commanderkai" said What good is that speed when data caps are low and overage charges cost an arm and a leg?
Because Rogers, Bell, and Telus can now point to this story when anybody even thinks about comparing US cell companies and Canadian ones. "Oh but we have better speeds! NOW FORK OVER YOUR FIRST BORN." You forgot the "BEND OVER" part.
That's because there is no rural service. At least in canada. A few years ago I did a cross canada road trip. Going east, after I left Ottawa, I didn't get any reception until I got to Thunder Bay.
I have a friend who used to work near CFB Cold lake. No one there had device expect for the people on Bell. Rogers people had nothing.
I have a friend who used to work near CFB Cold lake. No one there had device expect for the people on Bell. Rogers people had nothing.
They probabally still don't. Telus made a great effort in the 90s to get Digital Cellular service all along the route to and inside Fort Mac. Telus shares service with Bell. Rogers didn't want to spend the money, and no one shares with them.
That's 'cause there are fewer of us and therefore less demand to share bandwidth.
I'll bet that Verizon isn't wrecking the credit histories of dead people who never even subscribed to Verizon, as our beloved Rogers feels they can do.
Oh...wait...
What good is that speed when data caps are low and overage charges cost an arm and a leg?
Because Rogers, Bell, and Telus can now point to this story when anybody even thinks about comparing US cell companies and Canadian ones. "Oh but we have better speeds! NOW FORK OVER YOUR FIRST BORN."
What good is that speed when data caps are low and overage charges cost an arm and a leg?
Because Rogers, Bell, and Telus can now point to this story when anybody even thinks about comparing US cell companies and Canadian ones. "Oh but we have better speeds! NOW FORK OVER YOUR FIRST BORN."
You forgot the "BEND OVER" part.
I noticed they only did the test on Urban areas...........
Read the comments on the story - lots of them say what you just said.
I have a friend who used to work near CFB Cold lake. No one there had device expect for the people on Bell. Rogers people had nothing.
I have a friend who used to work near CFB Cold lake. No one there had device expect for the people on Bell. Rogers people had nothing.
They probabally still don't. Telus made a great effort in the 90s to get Digital Cellular service all along the route to and inside Fort Mac. Telus shares service with Bell. Rogers didn't want to spend the money, and no one shares with them.
A few years ago I did a cross canada road trip. Going east, after I left Ottawa, I didn't get any reception until I got to Thunder Bay.
You should have gone west instead. Makes the trip from Ottawa to Thunder Bay significantly shorter!
A few years ago I did a cross canada road trip. Going east, after I left Ottawa, I didn't get any reception until I got to Thunder Bay.
You should have gone west instead. Makes the trip from Ottawa to Thunder Bay significantly shorter!
Face palm. I can't believe I wrote that. Now I know how stockwell day felt when he got the direction of the niagra river wrong.
That's 'cause there are fewer of us and therefore less demand to share bandwidth.
I'll bet that Verizon isn't wrecking the credit histories of dead people who never even subscribed to Verizon, as our beloved Rogers feels they can do.