news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Submarine HMCS Windsor hobbled after $209M refi

Canadian Content
20675news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Submarine HMCS Windsor hobbled after $209M refit


Military | 206750 hits | Apr 30 1:04 pm | Posted by: martin14
29 Comment

CBC News has learned there is more trouble for Canada's fleet of used British submarines.

Comments

  1. by avatar martin14
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:09 pm
    It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

    Those subs are cursed.

  2. by avatar bootlegga
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:21 pm
    Concur. I wish we had dumped these long ago and bought something -anything - else.

  3. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:28 pm
    "bootlegga" said
    Concur. I wish we had dumped these long ago and bought something -anything - else.


    I keep saying that the US has a surplus of boomers tied up alongside at Bremerton and for what you folks have burned on these British heaps you could have a really awesome sub fit for launching a hundred or more Tomahawks or other similar cruise missiles.

  4. by avatar saturn_656
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:34 pm
    Worst. Military. Procurement. Ever.

  5. by avatar martin14
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:44 pm
    Tell you what, if the Argies start something in the Falklands again, I vote we
    help the Brits with a gift of 4 subs.

    Never been used, low mileage too !

    R=EM

  6. by avatar saturn_656
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 8:45 pm
    "martin14" said
    Tell you what, if the Argies start something in the Falklands again, I vote we
    help the Brits with a gift of 4 subs.

    Never been used, low mileage too !

    R=EM


    At least they'll draw fire away from the subs with actual combat ability.

  7. by avatar Hyack
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:24 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Concur. I wish we had dumped these long ago and bought something -anything - else.


    I keep saying that the US has a surplus of boomers tied up alongside at Bremerton and for what you folks have burned on these British heaps you could have a really awesome sub fit for launching a hundred or more Tomahawks or other similar cruise missiles.

    That may be true, but the cost of the infrastructure for the upkeep and maintenance of their power plants would be prohibitive. Does Canada really need Boomers, I think a few fast attack subs would be more in keeping with the needs of the RCN.

  8. by avatar ShepherdsDog
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:30 pm
    They're in training to become artificial reefs

  9. by avatar Vamp018
    Tue Apr 30, 2013 9:30 pm
    A Boomer could be either the Ohio conventional attack, WMD attack or you could obtain a Los Angeles Class Attack. We have two Los Angeles Class moored at Corpus.

  10. by avatar Jonny_C
    Wed May 01, 2013 5:11 am
    That's what we get when we try to do national defense "on the cheap".

  11. by avatar commanderkai
    Wed May 01, 2013 5:38 am
    "saturn_656" said
    Worst. Military. Procurement. Ever.


    Watch some future government do worse. I'm not sure how yet, but the Government of Canada will find a way!

  12. by avatar QBall
    Wed May 01, 2013 1:48 pm
    "Vamp018" said
    A Boomer could be either the Ohio conventional attack, WMD attack or you could obtain a Los Angeles Class Attack. We have two Los Angeles Class moored at Corpus.


    I SERIOUSLY doubt the U.S. government would sell a used nuclear powered anything, let alone a sub regardless of the type.

  13. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed May 01, 2013 1:54 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    Concur. I wish we had dumped these long ago and bought something -anything - else.


    I keep saying that the US has a surplus of boomers tied up alongside at Bremerton and for what you folks have burned on these British heaps you could have a really awesome sub fit for launching a hundred or more Tomahawks or other similar cruise missiles.

    You keep saying something that's a bad idea won't make it a good idea. :lol:

  14. by avatar Gunnair  Gold Member
    Wed May 01, 2013 1:55 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    Worst. Military. Procurement. Ever.


    Watch some future government do worse. I'm not sure how yet, but the Government of Canada will find a way!

    Uh, look at any of our current procurement ideas.

    Yeah, they'll do worse.



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2026 by Canadaka.net