news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

North Korea vows no softening under its new lea

Canadian Content
20796news upnews down

North Korea vows no softening under its new leader | CTV News


Political | 207958 hits | Dec 30 7:46 am | Posted by: Guy_Fawkes
15 Comment

North Korea warned the world Friday there would be no softening of its position toward South Korea's government after Kim Jong Il's death as Pyongyang strengthened his son and heir's authority with a new title: Great Leader.

Comments

  1. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:49 pm
    Did anyone expect anything different?

  2. by avatar GreenTiger
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:39 pm
    True an actually I woul expect a bit harder line as Kim Jung Un woul want to do something to show he is as much of a hardliner than his father.

    If his people were ever to understand the truth about him what they did to Kaddafy would be merciful compared to what they would do with him. He would be lucky to "only" have a bayonet shoved up his ass and his head kicked in.

  3. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:03 pm
    I dont know about the latter part, if there was a civil war in North Korea it would be long and very bloody.

  4. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:11 pm
    "Guy_Fawkes" said
    I dont know about the latter part, if there was a civil war in North Korea it would be long and very bloody.


    And it's a sure bet the South would get involved.


    -J.

  5. by avatar Guy_Fawkes
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:21 pm
    "CDN_PATRIOT" said
    I dont know about the latter part, if there was a civil war in North Korea it would be long and very bloody.


    And it's a sure bet the South would get involved.


    -J.
    If they did, I would pray that no one found proof.

  6. by avatar andyt
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:09 pm
    "CDN_PATRIOT" said
    I dont know about the latter part, if there was a civil war in North Korea it would be long and very bloody.


    And it's a sure bet the South would get involved.


    -J.

    As would China.

  7. by avatar GreenTiger
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:48 pm
    "andyt" said
    I dont know about the latter part, if there was a civil war in North Korea it would be long and very bloody.


    And it's a sure bet the South would get involved.


    -J.

    As would China.
    The irony is that S Korea and China need to have N Korea somewhat succeed as they don't want to get swamped with refugees.

  8. by avatar andyt
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:51 pm
    Eggsackly. But the refugees aren't the main problem, but that each doesn't want the other to take over NK.

  9. by avatar saturn_656
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:14 pm
    Eggsackly. But the refugees aren't the main problem, but that each doesn't want the other to take over NK.


    Wouldn't mind see China take responsibility for NK, after all if it wasn't for the intervention of China the UN would have easily defeated North Korea and we would be looking at a unified Korea today.

  10. by avatar andyt
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:22 pm
    Responsibility means take over. I don't think SK or the US would be very glad to see that.

  11. by avatar saturn_656
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:26 pm
    "andyt" said
    Responsibility means take over. I don't think SK or the US would be very glad to see that.


    If it were possible for SK to absorb NK I'd suggest that. The economic disparity between the two countries is far too huge and NK would be a massive dead weight on the economy of SK.

    Unlike other former Stalinist dictatorships, NK stubbornly refuses to liberalize itself.

    Are we going to have to deal with the nuclear blackmail 'till time eternal?

  12. by avatar CDN_PATRIOT
    Fri Dec 30, 2011 7:29 pm
    North Korea looks like it'll run itself into the ground eventually. Either that, or someone gets bored and starts pushing red buttons.

    -J.

  13. by avatar GreenTiger
    Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:16 am
    He probably will have to o something nasty as he does give the impression of being just some fat little squirt who inherited the DPRK Kim Throne.

  14. by avatar Freakinoldguy
    Mon Jan 02, 2012 9:04 am
    I guess batshit crazy really is hereditary. 8O



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net