news Canadian News
Good Morning Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

N. Korea to face new U.S. sanctions

Canadian Content
20700news upnews down

N. Korea to face new U.S. sanctions


Political | 206997 hits | Jul 24 12:06 pm | Posted by: wildrosegirl
14 Comment

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced Wednesday that Washington will impose new sanctions on communist North Korea in a bid to stem the regime's illicit atomic ambitions.

Comments

  1. by avatar GreenTiger
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:13 am
    I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.

    We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.

  2. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:21 am
    "GreenTiger" said
    I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.

    We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.


    And then what?

  3. by avatar GreenTiger
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 1:19 pm
    Well he isn't doing anything more than blowing gas out his anus as usual. If we do something stupid we could close camp 22, and start to feed his people and hopefully unite Korea under a decent Government. They deserve it.

  4. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:03 pm
    "GreenTiger" said
    Well he isn't doing anything more than blowing gas out his anus as usual. If we do something stupid we could close camp 22, and start to feed his people and hopefully unite Korea under a decent Government. They deserve it.


    I don't think you've really thought this through.

  5. by avatar CrazyCanuck007
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:23 pm
    Funny how the US thinks it's ok for N. Korea, and Pakistan to have Nukes, but heaven forbid if Iran wants to have nuclear power plants....
    But then, N. Korea and Pakistan would put up a hell of a fight if invaded...

  6. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:30 pm
    "Zipperfish" said
    I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.

    We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.


    And then what?

    Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.

    No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.

  7. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:38 pm
    "BartSimpson" said

    Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.

    No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.


    They've already made the first move. They sunk a military South Korean vessel killing--what?--48 soldiers. I think South Korea needs to grow a pair, myself.

  8. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:52 pm
    "Zipperfish" said

    They've already made the first move. They sunk a military South Korean vessel killing--what?--48 soldiers. I think South Korea needs to grow a pair, myself.


    The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.

  9. by avatar Zipperfish  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:29 pm
    "BartSimpson" said

    The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.


    I don't think China will stay out of it.

  10. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Thu Jul 29, 2010 5:56 pm
    "Zipperfish" said

    The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.


    I don't think China will stay out of it.

    Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports. This is not the 1950's and if Chinese troops engage US troops in Korea then the party will be on.

  11. by avatar Tman1
    Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:57 am
    "BartSimpson" said
    Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports.

    Besides the fact that trade is a global invention, as well as China not sitting on their heinies if a blockade commences, the U.S' economy (already in the sh*itter as it is) would be even worse off since the U.S imports more from China and China has the U.S by the nuts with their debt but that's irrelevant right? You're right, this isn't the 1950's. China has nukes and thousands of missiles that could aim right at your blockade. An enemy that can fight would be new for the U.S in this day and age.

  12. by avatar HyperionTheEvil
    Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:10 am
    "BartSimpson" said

    The South Koreans didn't want to go into this unilaterally. They needed both US backing of what they need to do and then they need the Chinese to stay out of it when Lil' Kim ends up with his forces backed up to the Yalu River. Don't want any repeats of 60 years ago.


    I don't think China will stay out of it.

    Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports. This is not the 1950's and if Chinese troops engage US troops in Korea then the party will be on.


    :roll:

  13. by avatar HyperionTheEvil
    Fri Jul 30, 2010 6:12 am
    "Tman1" said
    Then their economy will go in the sh*tter when the US Navy blockades their ports.

    Besides the fact that trade is a global invention, as well as China not sitting on their heinies if a blockade commences, the U.S' economy (already in the sh*itter as it is) would be even worse off since the U.S imports more from China and China has the U.S by the nuts with their debt but that's irrelevant right? You're right, this isn't the 1950's. China has nukes and thousands of missiles that could aim right at your blockade. An enemy that can fight would be new for the U.S in this day and age.


    Don't confuse poor Bart with with things like reality, he doesn't react well to it

  14. by avatar GreenTiger
    Fri Jul 30, 2010 1:52 pm
    "BartSimpson" said
    I would like ti see an incease in aid to the DPRK.

    We could donate naval mines around their harbors, Afew cruise missles to their communications towers and electrical grids and a few B-52 Strikes to return their puny airforce to mother earth.


    And then what?

    Then we spend a few trillion dollars waging the ground war and then rebuilding the country.

    No, we should not take any aggressive action towards them. Let them make the first move and then we pound them...hard. After it's done we let the South Koreans go in and run the place after holding war crimes trials and executing the DPRK leadership.

    You right Bart, to me the Mighty Midget is an annoying mosquito that needs to be swatted. If they are stupid enough to start anything only the South Koreans would have the moral authority to deal with the DPRK leadership.

    I would like the Tomb of Kim what every the F his name is turned into a public urinal or better a public mental hospital to treat the victims of the regime.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net