CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:41 pm
 


thats the general problem with secular people. They are quick to judge people(that are trying to follow their morals )as 'zealots' and 'bigots'.

They are quick to legalize their own vice's so they can justify their own lack of morals,

yet they still look down on the victims of society.

When was the last time some dope smoking doctor and a gay judge ever spent time at a half way house trying to help drug addicts and prostitutes? yet, there are ministries that do this.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 10503
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:14 pm
 


Don't spew your bullshit holier than thou bullshit here brother. Morals are not a sign of a religious person. and there are just as many, if not more secular agencies dedicated to helping the poor and destitute. just because you don't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. When was the last time YOU helped someone who was down and out with a couple of bucks? I get feeling the only time you look down is when you want to see what you are standing in. you've posted previously that you basically don't like gays , doesn't the bible say that god created all man in his image (Genesis 5:3)? and Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the LORD (Leviticus 19:18). wow, I'd say you have no morals as you can't even adhere to the golden rule. If there is a god, and he created all life, then he created ALL life gays and prostitutes and drug addicts included. this is the problem with religious people they pretend to hide behind their supposed superior moral fabric when in reality, they are just as petty and corrupt as the rest of us.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:35 pm
 


I dont see how someone can think that homosexual sex is immoral... care to clear that up?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:45 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
When was the last time some dope smoking doctor and a gay judge ever spent time at a half way house trying to help drug addicts and prostitutes? yet, there are ministries that do this.


Dope smoking doctor or gay judge?

Where do you come up with this stuff, if you want to talk about extremes Google Westboro Baptist Church.

btw Im sure that a person's sexual preference has no effect on their volunteer work, that is, as long its not some prude pseudo religious organization like the boy scouts.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:25 pm
 


Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
I dont see how someone can think that homosexual sex is immoral... care to clear that up?


i thought i said it licks balls.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:29 am
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
Guy_Fawkes Guy_Fawkes:
I dont see how someone can think that homosexual sex is immoral... care to clear that up?


i thought i said it licks balls.

Gay women don't lick balls... Now what? :?


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR

GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 20460
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 6:37 am
 


A slice of hair pie? :lol:


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:51 am
 


south park said that they lick rug


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 10:52 am
 


I still dont see how the sexual act of cunnilingus or sodomy can be seen as an immoral act. Morality doesnt even factor into it, if it was forced upon a person I could see how that would be thought of as immoral, but then it’s the act of rape that is immoral.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8738
PostPosted: Mon Jul 27, 2009 11:20 am
 


DerbyX DerbyX:
I can't find the picture/comic anymore but the last time something like this came up (nude statues causing offence) someone posted a funny cartoon that summed it up. It depicted a rather ugly and obese couple buldging out of their shorts expressing their disgust at the david like statue saying "egads, cover that up. Its filthy that I have to see something like that".

It would fit in here nicely also.

Couldn't find it, but here is one that may tweek yer funny bone(er.)

Image


Offline
Forum Elite
Forum Elite
 Pittsburgh Penguins


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 1055
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:16 am
 


From the original report:

$1:
Parents in Florida are complaining about a sculpture of a nude family outside a shopping centre west of Delray Beach.

Parents of children who attend a nearby elementary school say the bronze statue is inappropriate, and the Parent-Teacher Association president emailed parents Wednesday asking them to complain.....


#1 - They're emailing parents to ask them to complain along with them? Gee, maybe the reason why they haven't complained yet is because they don't have an issue with it.

#2 - I suppose it'd be more appropreate if it was a bunch of soldiers bayoneting somebody in a turban. It seems that violence and symbols of hate are more accepted then love and nudity.

$1:
The sculpture is by artist Itzik Asher and titled "Journey to the New." It is supposed to represent the journey of Russian and Ethiopian Jews from their homes to Israel. It was previously displayed at other locations in the area.

The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports that Asher's sculptures have drawn criticism before. In 1995, the Boca Raton City Council made him cover the private parts of several of his sculptures with cardboard fig leaves. The leaves were later removed.


What exactly does this say about a species that's so ashamed of their own physical appearance?

The sculptures are actually kinda crappy, but they don't even accurately represent a typical human physique for any decent reference other then somewhat looking like humans.

People should rather switch their focus on a few harmless sculptures and focus more on getting that stick out of their asses.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:02 pm
 


I wouldnt lable it as a species thing, its more of a Floridian thing.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 3598
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:44 pm
 


I always think of the Simpsons episode with Michelangelo's David on it.
"Won't someone please think of the children."

Seems weird to me that a society that is so flooded with sex and sexual references would find art offensive because of nudity, if they want to rid themselves of sexual references then they should go after the advertisers and big business that use sex to sell their products.

This artist is laughing all the way to the bank, all this is doing is giving his work exposure and intriguing people with more open minds about his work, It's like a friend of mine said, if you want kids to buy it put a swear word on it, same diff.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Calgary Flames
Profile
Posts: 3598
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:51 pm
 


ASLplease ASLplease:
appearantly not in the same way that you did. I feel sorry for you. Who will you hate when the world develops compassion for overweight people?


I think you misunderstood his point, the cartoon in question doesn't mock all overweight people, just those that walk around town in spandex or clothes that are obviously too small or too revealing, then has these said people being offended at having to see nudity and saying that it should be covered.
Personally I hate seing someone overweight that thinks they are not overweight, they don't dress appropriately, rolls hanging out of their belly shirts or tank tops, short shorts and what have you, we've all seen them walking around and though jeez, cover up.


Last edited by Choban on Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 5321
PostPosted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:51 pm
 


Meh I think we are due for another sexual revolution, lets get another baby boom goin [B-o]


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.