[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Her claims are false. We can see SPLC’s “hate list” for ourselves and see that shes not on it.

The end.

DEBUNKED

Ahh...so apparently you do know the definition of debunked as the rest of us understand the word. You simply choose to lie and use it incorrectly. Kind of sleazy man.

As I told you, the woman you're defaming countered SPLC's desperate excuse on the video above below now. As most of us know - and now even you admit - if something is "debunked" the argument is so strong it cannot be countered. Yet she did, and rather convincingly I might add.

You did not address her counter. You either did not watch her destroy your lame claim (in which case you're gutless) or you realize it is actually you and your pathetic, little, leftist smear patrol that have been "Debunked."

[N_Fiddledog]

Here ya go, Beave. Try again. I'm enjoying this.

[BeaverFever]

As I’ve told you before, constantly re-posting her false claim doesn’t prove it to be true. It doesn’t matter how many right wing nut shows she goes on to say she’s on the list. We can see she’s not on the list. Case closed. You’ve chosen to believe her over your own lying eyes because you’re a known zealot.

I’m not surprised that a known falsehood and batshit peddlar like yourself doesn’t understand the meaning of the word debunked. But you and she are yet again DEBUNKED.

[Coach85]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

As I’ve told you before, constantly re-posting her false claim doesn’t prove it to be true. It doesn’t matter how many right wing nut shows she goes on to say she’s on the list. We can see she’s not on the list. Case closed. You’ve chosen to believe her over your own lying eyes because you’re a known zealot.

I’m not surprised that a known falsehood and batshit peddlar like yourself doesn’t understand the meaning of the word debunked. But you and she are yet again DEBUNKED.

Beav, you make complete sense and your point is valid.

Fiddle seems to think the more he says things, the more they become true. Sadly, a common tactic from those on the far right.

[N_Fiddledog]

As I said on the previous page:

N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:

Again they miss the point.

Are we going for the record on how many times you're going to make me repeat something before you hear it?

Stop lying. It's you two who have nothing but a single smear from a Soros funded group of professional prevaricators. I've shown you multiple angles on how they're misrepresenting the truth, including the video response to their twisted truthiness from the girl they're smearing. We have yet to see either of you dare to respond to her. Neither of you seems brave or bright enough to attempt it.

Coach seems to think he offers authority by doing nothing more than giving Beave a couple tugs on the figurative weiner. He's wrong, of course, but apparently he too is desperate to believe the Southern Poverty Law Center has not become the politically biased bullies and liars they've been shown to be lately over and over again.

Sorry guys, you're both wrong. Live with it.

[BeaverFever]

Added emphasis below

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

As I’ve told you before, constantly re-posting her false claim doesn’t prove it to be true. It doesn’t matter how many right wing nut shows she goes on to say she’s on the list. We can see she’s not on the list. Case closed. You’ve chosen to believe her over your own lying eyes because you’re a known zealot.

I’m not surprised that a known falsehood and batshit peddlar like yourself doesn’t understand the meaning of the word debunked. But you and she are yet again DEBUNKED.

[N_Fiddledog]

And again if all you can do is beat a single point like a drum even after it's been challenged from multiple directions you fear addressing well then...you don't know what you're talking about. But who's surprised to discover that.

In fact all you do is torture the word 'debunk' with repeated misuse when the girl you're smearing with it has offered a convincing rebuttal and you're even afraid to respond to her.

BTW the outfit you're using to support the disgraced Souther Poverty Law Center continues to be challenged, or to use the new, reimagined Proggy definition one might say it's been "Debunked."

$1:

When will the media and these regressive progressive journalists stop lying?

Right Wing Watch (the George Soros-funded "progressive" advocacy site) and Jared Holt should really sort themselves out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw1B66efXVE

[BeaverFever]

More added emphasis

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Added emphasis below

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

As I’ve told you before, constantly re-posting her false claim doesn’t prove it to be true. It doesn’t matter how many right wing nut shows she goes on to say she’s on the list. We can see she’s not on the list. Case closed. You’ve chosen to believe her over your own lying eyes because you’re a known zealot.

I’m not surprised that a known falsehood and batshit peddlar like yourself doesn’t understand the meaning of the word debunked. But you and she are yet again DEBUNKED.

[BartSimpson]

[N_Fiddledog]

There's a kind of logical fallacy called Hasty Generalizaion.

I'd like to offer up what I'll call the Prog Corollary to that.' This also relies on making a 'hasty generalization' from an insufficient singular fact, but with this one the fact is always some technicality. It's like "You made a typo, so anything you now say regarding your larger and main point (in fact anything you may say about anything) now becomes false by association with your typo."

Now in this case the girl's point is that being on a Southern Poverty Law Center list carries an unwarranted stigma. She doesn't want to be on such a list. It can even be dangerous to be on one.

She tells us how Progressive nutbar Floyd Corkins walked into the Family Research Council with a pistol, a bag full of Chic-Fil-A sandwiches and the intention of taking the elevator to the top floor where he intended to rub the sandwiches into peoples' faces then shoot them. He got the FRC's name from a Southern Poverty Law Center map of people they disapprove of.

SPLC put Hannah Scherlacher on a list. She was placed on the list for talking to the Family Research Council.

She called SPLC up and asked them to take her off their list. They wouldn't. According to her they were playing word games with her. She was on A list, but she wasn't on THE list.

Beave wants to play the same word game. She is on A list. She is not on THE list he believed was specific to her complaint. She specifically said Hate List, you see.

Hannah doesn't think this matters. To her SPLC lists are all hate lists. Maajid Nawaz and Ayaan Hirsi Ali are on an A Southern Poverty Law Center list, but not on The list. There's a petition to take them off.

https://www.change.org/p/southern-pover ... extremists

The soul purpose of the SPLC currently seems to be this:



They're pointing at Hannah now. Why? Because the sorts of people who find SPLC credible think guilt by association is a thing. That's why.

In fact the group that gave Beave the distorted idea he's debunked something - the George Soros funded, Right Wing Watch - has branded Vloggers as white racists for just interviewing people they call 'alt-right'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw1B66efXVE

Hannah's Scherlacher's complaint is she doesn't want to be on any SPLC hate list. It is a hate list she's on. It serves the same purpose as all SPLC's lists including the one Beave is concerned with. It identifies enemies to the true believers of the Progressive agenda.

If the list really is no big thing why won't they take her off it? Why do they even need it?

Answer that one, Beave. Can't do it can you?

All you can do is continue to beat that single point drum. It's sounding off-beat. You're not even in the right auditorium anymore, Kid.

[BeaverFever]

Can you show me this SPLC “hate list” that’s supposedly “labelled” and “targeted” her and is so damaging to her reputation that she claims she’ll be explaining it for the rest of her life as she claims?

(You understand I’m asking you to show me the actual list that SPLC put out, not another clip of her claiming to be on a list that only she can see, right?)

[BartSimpson]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Can you show me this SPLC “hate list” that’s supposedly “labelled” and “targeted” her and is so damaging to her reputation that she claims she’ll be explaining it for the rest of her life as she claims?

(You understand I’m asking you to show me the actual list that SPLC put out, not another clip of her claiming to be on a list that only she can see, right?)

I had no problem finding it. Took me less than one minute. Can't figure out why you can't do this yourself.

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/201 ... dup-101317

She is listed on the Anti-LGBT roundup 10.13.17 subsection named FRC Radio Roundup.

Contextually she is then being listed as an anti-LGBT hater when in fact she was just a guest on the radio show commenting on a different topic.

Fiddy was exactly right.

[BartSimpson]

Oh, and do carry on.

[BeaverFever]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

Can you show me this SPLC “hate list” that’s supposedly “labelled” and “targeted” her and is so damaging to her reputation that she claims she’ll be explaining it for the rest of her life as she claims?

(You understand I’m asking you to show me the actual list that SPLC put out, not another clip of her claiming to be on a list that only she can see, right?)

I had no problem finding it. Took me less than one minute. Can't figure out why you can't do this yourself.

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/201 ... dup-101317

She is listed on the Anti-LGBT roundup 10.13.17 subsection named FRC Radio Roundup.

Contextually she is then being listed as an anti-LGBT hater when in fact she was just a guest on the radio show commenting on a different topic.

Fiddy was exactly right.

It’s a test and you failed. That’s exactly the same link I posted (and quoted) on page 1 of this thread!

Round and round we go!

[N_Fiddledog]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

It’s a test and you failed. That’s exactly the same link I posted (and quoted) on page 1 of this thread!

Kind of, but not really. Yours was a clip from the George Soros funded, Right Wing Watch page, not the page labeled Anti-LGBT Roundup from the Southern Poverty law center.

Seeing as all SPLC lists serve only to point out enemies of the Progressive Regressive Left's identity politics agenda they all carry the same stigma.

You don't want to be identified in SPLC pages for their wackos like Floyd Corkins to see. In fact remember that guy who shot Senator Scalise while terrorising Congressmen who were practising for a charity baseball game? He like Corkins was a big fan of SPLC with their maps and lists of the unindoctrinated.